Module · When the bot answers first

The Support Team AI Check

A support bot has one honest job: resolve the request, or hand it to someone who can, fast. The failure mode is quieter than an outage. The bot closes tickets it never solved, the customer gives up, and your dashboard calls that a win. This module checks the five things that separate real automation from expensive deflection: whether you measure resolution or just containment, how fast a stuck customer reaches a human, whether the agent-assist your team leans on is worth trusting, whether the knowledge behind the answers is current, and whether satisfaction survives contact with the bot.

Question 1 of 5 · Resolution, not deflection

Do you measure whether the bot actually resolved the issue, or just that it ended the chat?

Containment counts chats the bot handled without a human. Resolution counts problems the customer no longer has. They are not the same number, and the gap between them is customers who gave up. If your headline metric is containment, you are rewarding the bot for wearing people down.

Question 2 of 5 · Escape hatch is fast

When the bot cannot help, how quickly does the customer reach a human?

Every bot hits its limit. What matters is what happens next: an instant, obvious route to a person, or a loop that keeps offering articles the customer has already rejected. A slow or hidden escape hatch turns a minor failure into a furious customer, and the anger lands on the human who finally picks up.

Question 3 of 5 · Agent-assist is trustworthy

Can your agents trust what the AI drafts and suggests, or do they have to double-check it?

Agent-assist that drafts replies and surfaces answers speeds up good teams and quietly poisons careless ones. If the suggestions are often wrong, agents either waste time correcting them or, worse, paste them through unread. The tool is only a help if your team knows when to trust it and when not to.

Question 4 of 5 · Knowledge is current

Is the knowledge base behind your AI answers kept current, or quietly out of date?

A support bot is only as good as the content it reads from. Old prices, retired products, superseded policies: the bot will state them with total confidence. Nobody notices stale knowledge until a customer acts on a wrong answer, and by then it is a complaint, not a content-management problem.

Question 5 of 5 · Satisfaction survives the bot

Do customers who went through the bot end up as satisfied as those who reached a human?

This is the number that catches everything the others miss. If bot-handled customers rate their experience worse than human-handled ones, the automation is buying you cost savings against loyalty you cannot see leaving. Segment your satisfaction score by channel, or you are averaging away the damage.

For the statistics · one click each

Three questions for the public picture

These do not affect your score. They feed the anonymised, aggregated statistics; groups under 8 respondents are never shown.

What share of your support contacts does an AI bot handle first?

None
Under a quarter
A quarter to sixty percent
Over sixty percent
We do not track it

Which number does your team report as the bot's headline result?

Containment or deflection
Tickets handled
Confirmed resolution
Customer satisfaction
No headline metric

How does a stuck customer reach a human from the bot?

No human route
Only after several tries
On a clear request
Instantly on intent
No bot in use

Your context

Used to calibrate the report. Company size and sector remain in the anonymized dataset; your email does not.