
For your team
Team Practice
Module · What leaves when one person does
The Team Knowledge Resilience Check
Every team has a person whose absence would hurt more than the org chart suggests: the one who knows why the workaround exists, which client cannot be pushed, how the fragile process actually holds together. That knowledge is invisible until it walks out the door. AI can help capture and surface it, but only if it was ever written down. This module checks the five things that decide whether your team survives a departure intact: whether you know your bus factor, whether you document judgment and not just steps, how long onboarding really takes, how many single points of failure you carry, and whether capturing knowledge is a habit or an afterthought.
What the five levels look like
Every dimension in this assessment is scored 1 to 5. This is what the levels mean, dimension by dimension. The graded report diagnoses where your own answers land and what to do about it.
Bus factor is known
- 1No idea
- 2Vague sense
- 3Named informally
- 4Mapped clearly
- 5Mapped, being reduced
At the low end: If you do not know whose departure would cripple your team, you are one resignation away from a crisis you never saw coming. Map who holds the critical knowledge this month, before the market does it for you. What good looks like: A clear bus-factor map that you are actively reducing is genuine resilience. Keep it current as people and processes change; the single point of failure moves around.
Judgment is documented
- 1Nothing written
- 2Steps only
- 3Some context
- 4Judgment captured
- 5Judgment, kept live
At the low end: With nothing written down, every departure takes the whole playbook with it. Start by capturing the judgment behind your most critical process, not just the clicks. What good looks like: Documented judgment, kept alive, is what lets someone new make good calls and not just follow instructions. Keep refreshing it; captured judgment goes stale as the work evolves.
Onboarding is quick
- 1Many months
- 2A couple months
- 3A few weeks
- 4Days to weeks
- 5Days, self-serve
At the low end: Onboarding that drags on for months is a symptom of knowledge trapped in people rather than in documents. Have your next hire write down every question they had to ask, and fix the gaps they find. What good looks like: Fast, self-serve onboarding proves your knowledge lives in findable form, not just in heads. Keep the onboarding material current; it decays the moment the process changes and nobody updates it.
Few single holders
- 1Everything siloed
- 2Many single holders
- 3Some overlap
- 4Mostly shared
- 5Deliberately spread
At the low end: When critical knowledge sits in silos of one, your team is a collection of single points of failure. Pick the riskiest silo and pair someone alongside its holder starting now. What good looks like: Knowledge deliberately spread across people is what makes a team robust to any one departure. Keep spreading it as new critical knowledge forms; today's shared expertise is tomorrow's new silo if you stop.
Capture is a habit
- 1Only at exit
- 2When we remember
- 3Periodic pushes
- 4Regular routine
- 5Built into the work
At the low end: Capturing knowledge only when someone quits means you are always documenting in a panic and always missing most of it. Build a small, regular capture habit so resilience accrues before the resignation, not after. What good looks like: Capture built into the daily work is how a team stays resilient without heroics. Keep it low-friction; the moment documenting becomes a chore, it quietly stops happening.