World Model Readiness Where automation breaks at the seams

Module · Where automation breaks at the seams

The Cross-Team Handoff Check

AI speeds up what happens inside each team, then everything slows down at the handoff. The seams between teams are where automated output meets a different format, a different owner, and a different set of assumptions. This module checks the five that decide whether work flows across the boundary or piles up on it: interface clarity, format fit, who owns the seam, how errors route back, and whether anyone can see the whole path.

Question 1 of 5 · The interface is defined

When your team hands work to another, is it clear exactly what they expect?

The other team has a shape they need: fields, order, level of detail, definitions. If that shape lives in habit rather than in writing, every AI-generated handoff is a guess, and guesses drift.

Question 2 of 5 · Formats actually fit

Does AI-generated work arrive in a form the receiving team can use as is?

AI is fluent at producing almost-right formats: the near-miss spreadsheet, the summary that reads well but drops the field downstream depends on. Someone reformats it by hand, and the automation's time saving quietly leaks away at the seam.

Question 3 of 5 · The seam has an owner

Does anyone own the handoff itself, or only the two teams on either side?

Each team owns its own work and assumes the seam is the other team's problem. The gap between them is where things fall through, precisely because it belongs to no one. Automation widens that gap by moving work through it faster.

Question 4 of 5 · Errors route back fast

When a handoff arrives wrong, does the receiving team know where to send it back?

An error caught downstream needs a fast path back to whoever, or whatever, produced it. Without one, the receiving team silently fixes it themselves, the source never learns, and the same error arrives again next week.

Question 5 of 5 · The whole path is visible

Can anyone see a piece of work travel from your team to its final destination?

Each team sees its own leg. Nobody watches the relay. When AI speeds up the individual legs, the delays and drop-offs move to the handoffs, exactly where no single team is looking.

For the statistics · one click each

Three questions for the public picture

These do not affect your score. They feed the anonymised, aggregated statistics; groups under 8 respondents are never shown.

How many other teams does your team hand work to or receive it from regularly?

One
Two or three
Four to six
More than six
Never counted

Where does cross-team work most often stall today?

Wrong format on arrival
Nobody owns the seam
Errors with no way back
Nobody sees the whole path
It rarely stalls

How automated is the handoff between your team and the next?

Fully manual
AI drafts, humans pass it on
Partly automated seam
Mostly automated seam
Not sure

Your context

Used to calibrate the report. Company size and sector remain in the anonymized dataset; your email does not.