World Model Readiness Who decides, and who just weighs in

Module · Who decides, and who just weighs in

The Team Decision Hygiene Check

Most teams do not have a decision problem, they have a decision-hygiene problem: nobody is quite sure who owns the call, input gets mistaken for a vote, and the same question gets reopened for the third time. AI makes this worse, because a model will happily produce a confident recommendation that everyone treats as a decision nobody actually made. This module checks the five habits that keep decisions clean: clear ownership, telling a decision from an input, the ratio of meetings to actual calls, whether closed decisions stay closed, and whether anyone can reconstruct why you decided what you did.

Question 1 of 5 · Owners are clear

For your team's real decisions, is it clear who actually owns the call?

A decision without a named owner is a decision that gets made by drift, by whoever spoke last, or not at all. Clear ownership means one person can say yes and mean it. Without it, accountability evaporates and the call gets relitigated the moment it gets hard.

Question 2 of 5 · Decision versus input

Does your team tell the difference between making a decision and giving input?

Input is when your view is heard. A decision is when the call is made. Teams that blur the two leave people who were consulted believing they were overruled, and produce meetings where everyone talked and nothing was decided. AI recommendations sharpen the trap: a model's suggestion is input, not a verdict, however confident it sounds.

Question 3 of 5 · Meetings yield decisions

How many of your team's meetings actually produce a decision?

A meeting that ends without a decision is often a meeting that did not need to happen. The ratio of meetings to decisions is a quiet measure of your team's hygiene: a high one means people are gathering to feel progress rather than to make it. Every unnecessary meeting is time and attention you do not get back.

Question 4 of 5 · Closed stays closed

When your team makes a decision, does it stay made?

Some decisions should be revisited when the facts change. But a team that reopens closed calls out of doubt, politics, or forgetfulness never builds momentum, and its people stop committing to anything because nothing is really final. Knowing the difference between new evidence and old second-guessing is the skill here.

Question 5 of 5 · Decisions are recorded

Can your team reconstruct why it decided something six months later?

Without a record, a decision is only as durable as the memory of who was in the room, and memory rewrites itself. A short decision record, what was chosen, why, and what was rejected, is what lets you learn from the calls that went wrong and defend the ones that went right. It is also the only cure for relitigating the same question every quarter.

For the statistics · one click each

Three questions for the public picture

These do not affect your score. They feed the anonymised, aggregated statistics; groups under 8 respondents are never shown.

For your team's important decisions, how clear is who owns the call?

Usually unclear
Implied, not stated
Named up front
Named and widely known
Hard to say

How often do your team's meetings end with a clear decision?

Rarely
About half
Most of them
Nearly always
We have not looked

Does your team keep records of the decisions it makes?

No records
Scattered in chat
Recorded somewhere
Recorded with rationale
Not sure

Your context

Used to calibrate the report. Company size and sector remain in the anonymized dataset; your email does not.