Module · Bought is not the same as used

The Change & Adoption Readiness Check

The graveyard of AI projects is full of tools that worked and nobody used. This module tests whether adoption is engineered or assumed: whether incentives point the right way, the works council was brought in early, staff fears were addressed honestly, training fit the actual job, and feedback changes the tool.

Question 1 of 5 · Incentives point right

Do the people expected to use the AI benefit from using it, or only lose time?

A tool that saves the company money but costs the individual user time loses to the old way every day. Adoption follows the personal benefit, not the corporate case.

Question 2 of 5 · Works council on board

Was the works council or Betriebsrat involved before the rollout, not after?

In a co-determination culture, a council brought in after the decision is a council that can block it, and a workforce that has learned to distrust it. Early involvement is both a legal duty and an adoption asset.

Question 3 of 5 · Fears are addressed

Has anyone honestly addressed whether the AI threatens people's jobs?

The unspoken question in every rollout is whether this replaces me. Left unanswered, it becomes quiet resistance; vague reassurance convinces no one who is actually worried.

Question 4 of 5 · Training fits the job

Is training built around how people actually do their work, or a generic tool demo?

A feature tour teaches the tool; it does not teach the job. Training anchored in the user's real tasks is the difference between a tool people can use and shelfware.

Question 5 of 5 · Feedback changes things

When users report what does not work, does anything actually change?

Feedback collected and ignored is worse than none: it teaches people that speaking up is pointless. A visible closed loop turns users into co-owners of the tool.

For the statistics · one click each

Three questions for the public picture

These do not affect your score. They feed the anonymised, aggregated statistics; groups under 8 respondents are never shown.

What share of your licensed AI seats are actually used weekly?

Under 20 percent

20 to 50 percent

50 to 80 percent

Over 80 percent

We do not track it

How was your works council or Betriebsrat involved in AI rollouts?

We have no works council

Not involved

Informed after the decision

Consulted early

Co-determined the rollout

How was your last AI tool introduced to staff?

No rollout yet

Mandated top-down

Announced, self-serve

Piloted with volunteers

Co-created with users

Your context

Used to calibrate the report. Company size and sector remain in the anonymized dataset; your email does not.

Company size Sector (optional)

Your corporate email required

We do not accept Gmail, Outlook, GMX, etc. Use your company domain.

Anonymised answers feed aggregated public statistics (groups under 8 respondents are never shown); your email is deleted after confirmation. Details: Datenschutz.

I agree that my anonymized answers (without my email or company name) may be used in Thorsten's published analysis. Tell me when new assessments or question modules go live. One email per launch, opt out any time with one click.